Betting Systems Explained
Betting systems are structured approaches to managing bet sizing across a series of wagers. Roulette Tracker Pro supports six betting systems plus custom configurations. This comprehensive guide explains how each system works, when to use them, and their real-world performance.
Important Disclaimer
NO betting system can overcome the house edge. These systems change how you lose (or win) in the short term, not if you lose in the long term. The house edge is a mathematical constant:
- European Roulette: -2.7% expected return per dollar wagered
- American Roulette: -5.26% expected return per dollar wagered
Betting systems are tools for:
- Bankroll management
- Structured play (avoiding impulsive bets)
- Testing strategies
- Entertainment value
Use them for discipline and structure, not as a path to guaranteed profit.
System 1: Flat Betting
How It Works
Bet the same amount every single time. No increases, no decreases.
Example:
- Base bet: $10
- Bet 1: $10 (loss) → Bet 2: $10 (loss) → Bet 3: $10 (win) → Bet 4: $10
- Stake never changes
Pros
- Simplest system: No calculations needed
- Predictable bankroll: You always know maximum loss
- Low variance: No exponential growth
- Beginner-friendly: Perfect for first-time users
Cons
- Slow profit: Wins don't accelerate gains
- No loss recovery: String of losses = net loss
- Boring: No excitement from progression
When to Use
- First-time betting card users
- Small bankrolls ($100-$200)
- Conservative play
- Testing the app before using aggressive systems
Bankroll Requirement
Minimum: 20x base bet
Example: $10 base bet = $200 minimum bankroll
System 2: Martingale
How It Works
Double your bet after every loss. After a win, reset to base bet.
Example:
- Base bet: $5
- Bet 1: $5 (loss) → Bet 2: $10 (loss) → Bet 3: $20 (loss) → Bet 4: $40 (win) → Reset
- Net result after 4 bets: -$5 -$10 -$20 +$40 = +$5 profit
The Logic
Eventually you'll win, and when you do, you'll recover all previous losses plus one base unit.
Pros
- Guaranteed profit per cycle: If you win before bankroll depletes
- Intuitive logic: "I just need one win"
- High short-term win rate: Most sessions end in profit
Cons
- Exponential growth: $5 → $10 → $20 → $40 → $80 → $160 → $320...
- Table limits: Most tables cap bets ($500-$1,000 max). You hit the limit after 7-8 losses.
- Catastrophic ruin: One bad streak wipes out your entire bankroll
- False security: Feels safe because you win often, but rare losses are devastating
When to Use
- Large bankroll (minimum 100x base bet)
- Short sessions (5-10 bets max)
- High tolerance for risk
- NOT recommended for beginners
Bankroll Requirement
Minimum: 127x base bet (to survive 7 consecutive losses)
Example: $5 base bet = $635 minimum bankroll
Why 127? $5 + $10 + $20 + $40 + $80 + $160 + $320 = $635
Real-World Example
Player starts with $500 bankroll, $5 base bet:
- Bet 1: $5 (loss) → Bankroll: $495
- Bet 2: $10 (loss) → Bankroll: $485
- Bet 3: $20 (loss) → Bankroll: $465
- Bet 4: $40 (loss) → Bankroll: $425
- Bet 5: $80 (loss) → Bankroll: $345
- Bet 6: $160 (loss) → Bankroll: $185
- Bet 7: Can't afford next bet ($320 required) → BUST
Six consecutive losses (not uncommon!) wiped out $315 of a $500 bankroll.
System 3: Fibonacci
How It Works
Follow the Fibonacci sequence (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34...) when losing. On a win, move back two steps in the sequence.
Example:
- Base bet: $10
- Bet 1: $10 (1x) - loss
- Bet 2: $10 (1x) - loss
- Bet 3: $20 (2x) - loss
- Bet 4: $30 (3x) - win → Move back 2 steps
- Bet 5: $10 (1x) - back to start
The Logic
Less aggressive than Martingale. Slower progression means longer survival during losing streaks.
Pros
- Slower growth: Less risky than Martingale
- Recovers losses: Eventually recovers with wins
- Moderate variance: Balances risk and reward
Cons
- Still risky: Can reach large bets (34x, 55x...)
- Complex tracking: Need to remember sequence position
- Slow recovery: Takes multiple wins to reset
When to Use
- Moderate bankroll (50x base bet minimum)
- Medium-length sessions (10-30 bets)
- Risk-averse players who want some progression
Bankroll Requirement
Minimum: 50x base bet
Example: $10 base bet = $500 minimum bankroll
System 4: D'Alembert
How It Works
Increase bet by one unit after a loss. Decrease by one unit after a win.
Example:
- Base bet: $10 (1 unit)
- Bet 1: $10 (loss) → Bet 2: $20 (loss) → Bet 3: $30 (win) → Bet 4: $20 (win) → Bet 5: $10
The Logic
Based on the (incorrect) idea that wins and losses will balance out. Gentle progression limits risk.
Pros
- Very gentle: Slowest progression of all systems
- Low risk: Hard to go bust quickly
- Simple math: Just add/subtract one unit
- Good for long sessions: Can play many bets
Cons
- Slow profit: Takes many bets to see significant gains
- Can still escalate: 10 losses = 10x base bet
- Requires patience: Not exciting
When to Use
- Conservative players
- Small to moderate bankrolls
- Long sessions (50+ bets)
- Testing strategies without high risk
Bankroll Requirement
Minimum: 30x base bet
Example: $10 base bet = $300 minimum bankroll
System 5: Reverse D'Alembert (Contra D'Alembert)
How It Works
Opposite of D'Alembert: Increase bet by one unit after a WIN. Decrease by one unit after a LOSS.
Example:
- Base bet: $10
- Bet 1: $10 (win) → Bet 2: $20 (win) → Bet 3: $30 (loss) → Bet 4: $20
The Logic
Capitalize on winning streaks by increasing bets when you're winning. Decrease exposure when losing.
Pros
- Rides momentum: Profits multiply during hot streaks
- Limits loss exposure: Reduces bets when losing
- Psychologically satisfying: Feels good to increase bets when winning
Cons
- Requires winning streaks: Doesn't work well if results alternate
- Can give back profits: One loss at high stakes erases multiple wins
- Streaks are rare: 5+ consecutive wins are uncommon
When to Use
- Optimistic players
- Chasing winning streaks
- Moderate risk tolerance
Bankroll Requirement
Minimum: 30x base bet
Example: $10 base bet = $300 minimum bankroll
System 6: Paroli (Reverse Martingale)
How It Works
Double your bet after each WIN. After 3 consecutive wins (or a loss), reset to base bet.
Example:
- Base bet: $10
- Bet 1: $10 (win) → Bet 2: $20 (win) → Bet 3: $40 (win) → Reset to $10
- Or: Bet 1: $10 (win) → Bet 2: $20 (loss) → Reset to $10
The Logic
Let profits run during winning streaks. Losses are always limited to base bet.
Pros
- Low risk: Max loss per cycle is base bet
- High upside: 3 consecutive wins = 7x base bet profit
- Exciting: Feels great when streaks hit
- Protects bankroll: Losses don't compound
Cons
- Streaks are rare: 3 consecutive wins only happen ~12% of the time
- Frequent resets: Most cycles end after 1-2 bets
- Needs luck: Relies on short-term variance going your way
When to Use
- Risk-averse players
- Small bankrolls
- Short, fun sessions
- Entertainment-focused play
Bankroll Requirement
Minimum: 20x base bet
Example: $10 base bet = $200 minimum bankroll
System 7: Custom
How It Works
Define your own rules. Configure:
- First loss rule: What to do after first loss (e.g., bet 1.5x)
- Second loss rule: What to do after second consecutive loss (e.g., bet 2x)
- Third+ loss rule: Subsequent losses (e.g., bet 3x)
- Win rule: What to do after a win (e.g., reset to base, decrease by 0.5x, etc.)
- Max multiplier: Cap on how high bets can go (e.g., 10x base max)
Example Custom System:
- First loss: Bet 1.5x
- Second loss: Bet 2x
- Third+ loss: Bet 2.5x
- Win: Reset to base
- Max multiplier: 5x
When to Use
- Advanced players
- Testing proprietary strategies
- Simulating systems you read about
- Fine-tuning risk/reward balance
System Performance Comparison
Simulated over 1,000 spins, $10 base bet, even-money bets (Red/Black):
| System | Avg ROI | Max Drawdown | Ruin Risk | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat | -2.7% | Low | Very Low | Beginners |
| Martingale | -2.7% | Very High | High | High rollers |
| Fibonacci | -2.7% | Moderate | Moderate | Balanced play |
| D'Alembert | -2.7% | Low-Moderate | Low | Conservative |
| Reverse D'Alembert | -2.7% | Moderate | Low-Moderate | Streak chasers |
| Paroli | -2.7% | Low | Very Low | Fun sessions |
Key Insight: All systems have the same long-term expected return (-2.7%). They differ only in variance and ruin risk.
Choosing the Right System
If you have a SMALL bankroll ($100-$200):
- Use: Flat Betting or Paroli
- Avoid: Martingale, Fibonacci
If you have a MODERATE bankroll ($200-$500):
- Use: D'Alembert or Fibonacci
- Avoid: Martingale
If you have a LARGE bankroll ($500+):
- Use: Any system, but understand the risks
- Test: Custom systems
If you're RISK-AVERSE:
- Use: Flat Betting, D'Alembert, or Paroli
If you want EXCITEMENT:
- Use: Martingale (with caution), Paroli, or Reverse D'Alembert
Common Mistakes
1. Using Martingale Without Sufficient Bankroll
7 consecutive losses require 127x base bet. If you can't afford that, don't use Martingale.
2. Chasing Losses by Switching Systems Mid-Session
"Flat betting isn't working, let me try Martingale!" This is how you go bust. Stick to your system.
3. Believing Systems Overcome House Edge
They don't. All systems lose 2.7% per dollar wagered over the long run. Use them for structure, not profit.
4. Ignoring Table Limits
Martingale and Fibonacci can quickly hit table max ($500-$1,000). Check limits before playing.
Key Takeaways
- Betting systems change variance and bankroll volatility, not expected return
- Flat Betting: Safest, simplest, best for beginners
- Martingale: High risk, high volatility, requires large bankroll
- Fibonacci: Moderate risk, moderate volatility
- D'Alembert: Low risk, gentle progression
- Reverse D'Alembert: Rides winning streaks
- Paroli: Low risk, fun for short sessions
- Custom: Advanced users testing proprietary strategies
Ready to test? Create a betting card at /assistant and try different systems!
Ready to apply what you learned?
Use our tools to track real games, test strategies, and see probability in action.